![]() What in the handling is more realistic? I'm curious. What in the sound do you find more realistic? Why do you think Timewarp is more realistic than Arturias version? I don't understand your statement that Timewarp is more realistic if the Timewarp sound like in the video. Perhaps one need to tweak, use the possibilities and work on the sound. ![]() In general I love the sound from arturia synths, and I'm not only impressed by the design of the pluginsīased on the sounds of the original that i can come across, then i'd say Arturias ARP 2600 can come quite close in sound in many aspects. So if you're interested in 'realisticness' then you can try the timewarp but if its about the creativity then arturia is just fine. What is better with the arp2600 v3 is that there is a sequencer which gives you another million possibilities. It is closer to the original in sound and in handling. I bought also the timewarp 2600 and it is really different to the arp 2600v3. Some people write that the ARP 2600V3 is sounding nothing like the original (lol) but from what I hear in the videos it sounds really good. Yea sure, analog sounds grittier and rougher but you can get this with other plugins that emulate analog effects. I mean you could easily create almost exact the same sound with a plugin if you invest time in the patch. Well, after all I think this discussion about 'sound' and the comparison between the sound of plugins and analog is so overrated. ![]() Hey, also thanks for the vids I had to laugh hard at the frogs
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |